Matt Goyer Logo

 

nav
Home
About
Contact
MediaCenter
Resume
Photos
Stories
Movies
Books
Wiki
FAQ

fav sites
Gizmodo
Engadget
Slashdot
News
CNET
Wired
DazeReader

friends
Adam
Andrea*
Angie
Benny
Brad
Chris
Christine*
Craig*
Curt
David*
Donny*
Emily*
Gary
Gords*
Jacks*
Jam*
Jesse
Jessica
John
Jon*
Kevin
Lauren
Maeve
Mark*
Ming
Nat
Nick
Nicole*
Orr
Paul
Rafi*
Rannie
Tracy

UW WebBloggers
join
random
prev
next

 
 

Permalink to this day Saturday, March 02, 2002

Ack! I lost a post.

Last week the Wall Street Journal broke an excellent story. Unfortunately the WSJ is a subscription only site though because the story was such a good one and because I love receiving cease & desist letters I'm going to republish. The article is entitled Pop Singer Falls To Strike a Chord Despite the Millions Spent By MCA and is a must read.

Basically MCA blew $2.2 million dollars trying to turn Carly Hennessy (not Carly Hennessey) into the next Celine Dion. Total sales of Carly's album: 378.
10:21:14 PM  Permalink to this item []


Someone added a comment about porn to my Michael Green rant and it has brought to the surface another issue.

I think the music industry has a lot to learn from the porn industry.

How are they similar? Both are..

  • content industries.
  • driven by the profit motive.
  • worried about 'pirates'.
The big difference between the two is that the porn industry is making huge profits online while the music industry is most definitely not. So let's examine what the porn industry does well.

  1. Popular format. Instead of providing pictures and movies in a proprietary format the porn industry provides it's content in formats playable on just about any computer and electronic device. On the other hand the music industry wants you to listen to music using a format laced with Digital Rights Management (DRM) which will limit the number of people you can share the song with and how many times you can play it. These DRM formats will only play under certain OSes and certain devices. This infuriates customers. My conclusion: Give the customer what they want, whether it be jpeg images or MP3 files; the customer is always right. I believe that this is the number one reason that the porn industry has fared so well. Instead of fighting it's customers it works for them giving them what they ask for even if it means they may lose some sales.
  2. Meta-data and organization. Advancements in technology has brought us not only more music but more porn. Today anyone can produce their own content. What this means for the you the consumer is more content. Great! But what if you can't find what you want? You need someone to organize it right? And that's reason #2 that people will pay for porn. Likewise people will pay to download music online if the songs are correctly tagged and organized.
  3. Speedy downloads. Yes you can use any number of P2P networks to get your music or porn but despite all the fancy techonlogy behind those networks it still takes an incredibly long time to get what you want. People pay for porn because they can get it faster saving them time and money. Likewise people will pay for the speedy online delivery of music.

Thoughts? (Yes the porn industry is evil but they're good at moving units).
8:15:28 PM  Permalink to this item []


We skied Horseshoe today which boasts the world's shortest detachable quad. That's right. Shortest. I think I've reached the conclusion that I'd rather not ski than ski the teases. Of course being a student with no reading week/March break/spring break means at least another year of no big hill action.

The other problem with day-skiing is that you end up skiing on no sleep since you have to wake up so damn early to drive to the hill and when you get home you're dead. I know. I'm a whiner.
7:43:05 PM  Permalink to this item []


Ah! After being the 'authorative' Google source for the 'Thanks for lunch mike' mystery spam emails I finally have received my very own copy.

Here it is headers and all. (I know I shouldn't get so excited about spam but I did feel left out).

Received: from ns1.superior98.com ([63.170.11.198]) 
by pollak.overlookmedia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.3779);
	 Sat, 2 Mar 2002 00:50:49 -0500
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 00:50:47 -0500
Message-Id: <200203020550.g225olR03514@ns1.superior98.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.388)
Reply-To: 
From: 
To: 
Subject: Thanks For Lunch Mike
Return-Path: susan7888@smtp2.superior98.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Mar 2002 05:50:50.0021 (UTC) FILETIME=[34F7CD50:01C1C1AE]

Mike,

Thanks again for lunch it was great!

Best regards,

Steve


12:56:56 AM  Permalink to this item []

In 7 hours the IBM, RIM, and EmergentMusic co-ops are going skiing (if it's possible to go skiing one hour outside of Toronto!). Should be interesting.
12:51:14 AM  Permalink to this item []

© Copyright 2005 Matt Goyer.

My Found Links view RSS
 The Star.

My Media Center Blog view RSS
 Can anyone help out Mike?
 Gyration sucks
 Ben has some complaints about MCE
 How to put MCE/DVR-MS content on your PSP
 New Expert Zone article on burning and archiving
 Why I don't have Comcast
 Cool looking small MCE
 MCE needs a better name
 I cancelled our cable subscription today
 Audio interviews with JoeB and Jeremy Allaire

March 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            
Feb   Apr

On this day in
2001 2002 2003

mail *at* mattgoyer.com

And who are you?

Disclaimer: The posts on this weblog are provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confer no rights. The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way.

Canadian Flag eh!

Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.



Search blog.mattgoyer.com
Search www.mattgoyer.com

University of Waterloo alumni
Updated: 4/11/2005; 7:08:55 PM.